This short essay discusses the issue of poverty in Nepal. First, a brief discussion on poverty scenario is provided, then causes and consequences of poverty are discussed. The essay concludes with a few recommendations that policymakers could use for fighting poverty in Nepal.
Despite a number of attempts to tackle it, poverty in Nepal is a rampant phenomenon and Nepal remains one of the poorest countries in the world. Nepal has been and remains a member of the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) for many years. According to the United Nations Development Programme’s Human Development Report 2014, Nepal has 145th position out of 187 countries in terms of human development. Steady flow of remittances and other attempts to reduce poverty have been able to reduce poverty in recent years, but the pace has been very slow. An Oxford study recently found that Nepal is reducing poverty faster than India.
“The success of Nepal and Bangladesh in reducing poverty despite their relatively low income highlights the effectiveness of social policy investments combined with active civil society engagement,” says Dr. Sabina Alkire, director of Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative.
While talking about poverty situation in Nepal, one Nepali panelist linked the issue with Nepali identity.
“In fact, poverty has become one of the identities of Nepal. If you browse any internet search engine and try to get general information about Nepal then it is very likely that you will get a sentence starting as ‘Nepal is one of the poorest and least developed countries in the world….’ The facts indicate the same. Still today, millions of people are estimated to be living in abject poverty in Nepal, a striking majority of them in rural areas.”
|GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$) (2016)||837.0|
|Population, total (2014)||28,982,771|
|Rural population (2014)||22,990,673.0|
|Number of rural poor (million, approximate) (2014)||6,299,444.4|
Why is Nepal so Poor?
There are many reasons for why Nepal is so poor. These include decades of political instability as well as oppressive rulers such as the Ranas and the Shah kings. Nepal is a landlocked country with mountainous terrains and that has made development very challenging. Many believe that India’s interference in Nepal’s politics and rampant corruption in Nepali bureaucracy are also responsible for aggravating poverty in Nepal.
Understanding Poverty in Nepali Context
Though definition of poverty itself is highly debated and many countries and institutions follow different dimensions to determine poverty status of a population. Nepal has followed its own definition; according to which, a person earning less than one US dollar a day is termed as poor. According to the World Bank, 15% of Nepal’s population lived below the $1.90 a day poverty line in 2010, and the estimation for 2017 is 10.8%.
The concept of relative poverty used to be virtually absent in Nepal. However, in recent years, the gap between rich and poor people is widening and relative poverty is also part of public and media discussion.
|Source: The Kathmandu Post, 6 November 2003
POVERTY IN NEPAL: PENURY FORCES FOUR OF FAMILY TO END LIFE
On 4 November, four members of a Chaurasiya family committed suicide, being unable to pay the debts they had borrowed from a local moneylender three years ago.
The incident occurred at Nagawa Tol of the Birgunj Sub-Metropolis. According to the neighbours, Paramananda Chaurasiya, aged 38, the head of the family, had borrowed Rs 10,000 from local moneylender Satya Narayan Sah after mortgaging his house for Rs 30,000.
The money was borrowed about three years ago to fund a legal battle over tenancy right with his landlord Gopal Chaurasiya. Paramanada’s mother Sitadevi Chaurasiya, aged 65, wife Urmila Devi, aged 35, and daughter Satya, aged 17, were among those killed.
Police officials investigating into the incident suspected that the Chaurasiya family committed suicide due to financial crisis caused by a long-drawn-out legal battle over tenancy rights.
Sociologists distinguish between relative and absolute poverty, and the distinction is equally relevant to understanding the poverty in Nepal as well. Absolute poverty occurs when people fail to receive sufficient resources to support a minimum of physical health and efficiency, often expressed in terms calories or nutritional levels. Relative poverty is defined by the general standards of living in different societies and what is culturally defined as being poor rather than some absolute level of deprivation. (The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology)
Poverty in Nepal is mainly a rural phenomenon with approximately 75% of the population living in villages, with agriculture as their main source of subsistence. Of the total poor, “over 90 percent live in rural areas.” In urban areas, the poverty incidence is almost 23% which is significantly lower than in rural areas. The similar differences can be seen in terms of ecological zones as well.
lower caste people are found to be desperately poor, whereas, higher caste people get more share of income distribution.
Similarly, lower caste people are found to be desperately poor, whereas, higher caste people get more share of income distribution. Untouchables, socially excluded indigenous communities and women suffer more from poverty in comparison to others.
Recent statistics show that the incidence of poverty has been decreasing in Nepal, but the pace is desperately slow. Nepal has made progress in raising living standards over the last fifty years, particularly since the 1990s. Yet the country’s level of human development remains among the lowest in the world. On the other hand, the burgeoning gap between the haves and have-nots is another major threat to poverty reduction approaches in Nepal.
Causes of Poverty in Nepal
It is a bitter reality in Nepal that the majority of people are struggling to satisfy their stomach twice a day. There have been many political changes, but people’s fate has not changed significantly.
It has been often argued in Nepal’s case that poverty has been isolated only as an economic and growth problem which is, in fact, the major cause of poverty. Poverty is a political issue and it can not be solved by technocrats and professional consultants. If the state is not ready to see poverty as a violation of human rights, the aim of poverty alleviation will remain a distant dream for many years. And, as a matter of fact, this ill-perception is one of the major causes of poverty in Nepal.
Feudalistic land system of Nepal has also played a major role in aggravating the poverty in Nepal. Only a few percentage of people hold large size of land in Nepal, but large size of people hold small size of land. Worst of all, 24.4% of households do not own any land in Nepal. The land fragmentation is a rapid phenomenon and exploitation of the workers is also intense. The democratic governments of the post 1990s have taken some measures to equally distribute the land, but all of their plans were aborted due to the lack of a political will, and also probably due to the sheer pressure from the feudal elites.
More than 85% of the population in Nepal is involved in agriculture activities as its main source of subsistence. However, majority of the people have continued the traditional way of agriculture instead of adopting modern and scientific way. On the other hand, the state has failed to provide necessary infrastructure, equipments and trainings to the farmers.
High rate of population growth and low economic progress are two strong pillars for poverty in Nepal. Many programmes have been ratified by different sectors for population control; however, the population of Nepal is growing by 2.24% per annum. If this pattern of growth continues then Nepal’s population will be doubled within almost 33 years and will reach nearly fifty million. Whereas economic growth rate of Nepal is miserably low. For instance, average GDP growth rate of Nepal over past decades is less than 4 percent.
Growing unemployment and underemployment rate also is responsible for fuelling the poverty crisis in Nepal. A recent statistics of the Central Bureau of Statistics Nepal shows that 4.7% of economically active people are unemployed and almost 47% of them are underemployed. There has been a slight increase in the number of self-employed people, but it will not contribute significantly for poverty alleviation. Thousands of youths are compelled to relinquish their ambitions due to absolute poverty and unemployment. Annually thousands of students pass-out their university degrees, but the government is unable to provide them suitable jobs.
Structure of national income distribution is rigidly centralized in the urban cities and few percent high ranked people. This inequality in income distribution has severely perpetuated the gap between the haves and have-nots. Similarly, at a time when the national economy itself is not internally integrated, the tentacles of globalization have spread in the Nepali markets as well. Its tangible effects will be seen in the future, but many indications show that so far globalization has contributed, indeed, to ruin the Nepalese economy.
It has been anticipated that poverty in some parts of Nepal has worsened after the 2015 earthquake that killed nearly 9000 people. With young kids languished in parts of Kathmandu and other major cities, child poverty is another serious issue in Nepal.
Consequences of Poverty in Nepal
While looking at consequences of poverty in Nepal, It is extremely difficult to decide from where to start. Poverty has been the root cause of many problems in Nepal. Poverty is, directly or indirectly, responsible for myriad of problems such as high population growth, poor health conditions, low development parameters, youth delinquencies, crime as well conflict.
Thousands of Nepali youths migrate every month to the Indian and gulf cities in search of low-paid menial jobs. The number of girls and women trafficked for prostitution is alarming. From 1996 to 2006, Nepal suffered a trauma of a bloody civil war. The damage caused by the war, both physical and psychological was vast. During the war, more than 17000 people lost their lives, while many thousands were injured or disappeared. More than one hundred thousand people were internally displaced and Nepal’s economy was badly affected. Poor Nepal served as a fertile land for the growth of a radical Maoist insurgency. Desperate and unemployed youths joined the rebels, with the aspiration of establishing an egalitarian society.
Poverty Reduction Strategies & Poverty Alleviation Approaches in Nepal
Planned development in Nepal was established in 1956 and more than tenth five years plans have been already implemented. In later years, the five years plans have been curtailed into shorter, three-years plans. In all previous fiscal years, poverty alleviation has been one of the most prioritized agendas of Nepali governments.
Several initiatives have been taken by different development stakeholders for poverty alleviation in Nepal. On one hand, state-centred poverty reduction approaches can be seen, whereas, on the other hand, nongovernmental organizations, community groups and market/economic institutions are also involved in poverty alleviation activities in Nepal.
Poverty Alleviation Approaches in Nepal
Poverty Alleviation Policy Scenario
Several initiatives have been taken by many institutions and organizations, but why poverty has not been reduced at a faster rate? This is an important question in Nepal’s development sector today.
Nepal can fight poverty successfully only if the government brings the empowerment agenda to the centre of its poverty reduction strategy.
It is quite obvious that many poverty alleviation programmes were initiated after the reestablishment of democracy in 1990. However, during the democratic period also, Nepali political ground always became unstable and murky with minimum political will and rampant corruption. On the other hand, most of the programmes were imposed from above without a meaningful involvement of those for whom these programmes were meant. Similarly, policies and institutions also failed to be inclusive and pro-poor. So Nepal can fight poverty successfully only if the government brings the empowerment agenda to the centre of its poverty reduction strategy.
Apart from these, the following initiatives should be taken in order to get rid of the vicious cycle of poverty in Nepal.
- Poverty should be seen more as a political issue and less as a economic or growth problem.
- Land distribution should be radically reformed and the chains of feudalism should be dismantled.
- The poor should be empowered and bottom-to-up development approaches should be ratified instead of conventional development or anti-poverty approaches.
- Rural industrialization should be promoted and modernization in agriculture should be a must.
- Policies and institutions should be inclusive and pro-poor.
- Rule of law should be exercised and democratic norms and rules should be promoted.
- Relevant programmes should be designed and conducted for low population growth and high economic progress.
- Ample employment opportunities should be created within the country and increasing brain-drain incidences should be stopped.
In conclusion, fighting poverty is not a simple task. It requires years of relentless effort and concerted actions at local and global level. On the other hand, transparent and accountable political leadership and a system that is based in the principle of the rule of law is also essential in the fight against poverty.